Baylee Abernathy

Financial markets remained focused on geopolitical developments in the Middle East this week, with little economic data to digest. Signs that tensions might ease – most notably President Trump’s decision to postpone strikes on Iran’s power plants – provided temporary relief to oil prices early in the week. Planned strikes have now been delayed for a second time, to April 6th. Additionally, President Trump’s trip to China has reportedly been rescheduled for mid-May, fueling speculation that the administration may seek to de-escalate the conflict and pivot back toward major trade negotiations. Despite tentative signs of optimism, the broader geopolitical backdrop remains highly volatile. Peace proposals from Washington and Tehran remain far apart, hostilities continue, and additional U.S. forces are moving into the region. Energy markets have remained acutely sensitive to these developments (Chart 1).

The conflict has exposed vulnerabilities in the global energy supply system, particularly across parts of Asia that rely heavily on Middle Eastern oil and shipping routes. Fuel rationing remains the exception rather than the rule thus far, so the immediate economic impact has come through higher energy prices. In the U.S., average gasoline prices are hovering near $4 per gallon, while diesel prices have moved above that mark.

Elevated energy prices have complicated the monetary policy backdrop. The Fed has left open the possibility of rate cuts later this year, but policymakers have become increasingly cautious amid renewed inflation risks tied to higher fuel costs and trade disruptions. Market pricing has pushed out rate cuts, and raised the odds of a rate hike (Chart 2). Importantly, this repricing reflects growing uncertainty around the inflation outlook, rather than explicit guidance from the Fed.

Recent communication from Fed officials reinforces this “watchful waiting” stance. Vice Chair Philip Jefferson noted that labor market conditions remain “roughly in balance”, yet he highlighted upside risks to inflation from the recent surge in energy prices and potential tariff pass-through effects. These have stalled disinflation and are likely to keep inflation above target over the near term. He affirmed support for the current policy stance, stating that it is well positioned to respond to evolving risks. Governor Lisa Cook echoed this measured tone, underscoring the need to monitor tail risks that could tighten financial conditions abruptly.

Looking ahead, the path of the conflict is highly uncertain. Against this backdrop, the Fed is likely to remain cautious, with recent communications suggesting that the path toward eventual easing has not been closed, but it is increasingly contingent on a sustained easing in inflation pressures. Next week features a heavy slate of data, including the first readings for March. The ISMs will be closely watched to see if the conflict has affected sentiment yet, while the jobs numbers will shed light on how “balanced” the labor market remained. The consensus is that both measures will remain fairly steady, but the details will be closely parsed.

Admir Kolaj, Economist | 416-944-6318

Financial markets remained on edge this week as the conflict in the Middle East escalated, with uncertainty expanding into physical energy supply rather than just shipping disruptions. Reports of damage to key oil and LNG facilities in the Gulf, including infrastructure that could take months—if not longer—to repair, have injected a persistent risk premium into energy markets. Oil prices have swung sharply day‑to‑day and remain well above pre‑conflict levels (Chart 1). This dynamic remains consistent with the base case in our Quarterly Economic Forecast, but risks of even higher prices are growing. Higher gasoline prices hurt consumer spending and the prolonged uncertainty raises downside risks in energy‑importing regions. We flagged these concerns this week in our State Economic Forecast, especially for states with higher exposure to transportation, manufacturing, and energy‑intensive industries.

Against this backdrop, the Federal Reserve held its policy rate steady this week, as expected, but the statement was cautious. Chairman Powell acknowledged the heightened uncertainty stemming from the Middle East conflict, and revised projections showed higher inflation relative to December. The Fed continues to signal just one rate cut this year, reflecting concern that higher energy prices could slow the disinflation process at a time when core inflation is already proving sticky. Market reaction reinforced inflation concerns, with fed funds futures beginning to price a non‑trivial risk that the next move in rates may not be lower (Chart 2). Our commentary noted that the Fed appears intent on preserving flexibility, particularly given the risk that a prolonged energy shock could push the economy toward an uncomfortable mix of slower growth and firmer inflation.

Against this backdrop, markets continued to reprice risk this week in response to higher energy prices and a more cautious Federal Reserve. Equity markets struggled to find footing, while Treasury yields pushed higher as inflation risks moved back to the foreground. Incoming economic data offered a mixed picture. New home sales fell sharply in January, a reminder that interest‑rate‑sensitive sectors remain vulnerable to higher yields, though weather effects likely exaggerated the weakness. More broadly, the data flow reinforces that financial conditions are doing more of the near‑term adjustment work as the economy absorbs another external shock.

Looking ahead to next week, attention will undoubtedly remain on developments in the Middle East. Beyond the headlines, investors will also be watching how Fed officials are responding to the evolving situation and also the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey, a widely followed gauge of household confidence and inflation expectations. With energy prices and volatility high, these data could offer early signs of whether the current shock is beginning to weigh more materially on sentiment—or inflation expectations—an outcome that would further complicate the policy backdrop.

Financial markets faced another week of volatility as the conflict in the Middle East intensified. Iranian attacks against vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz and energy infrastructure in the region has kept energy prices elevated, with oil prices remaining in the $90-100 per barrel range through the end of the week. The announcement that International Energy Agency member countries would release strategic oil reserves provided some relief to the tumult in financial markets, but on aggregate, the near-term risk outlook for the global economy remains elevated. As of the time of writing, the S&P 500 is down 1.2% and the U.S. 10-Year yield is up 14 basis points on the week to 4.27%.

The U.S. remains partially insulated from the spike in global energy prices as a net energy exporter, but the conflict is still expected to create a light headwind for growth this year. The duration of the conflict and its impact on energy prices remains highly uncertain, but the recovery time for energy markets is expected to be measured in months not weeks. This will likely weigh on U.S. consumers and businesses over the near-term.

Inflation data for February, which pre-dated the rise in global energy prices, showed that inflationary pressures were still somewhat elevated to start the new year. The 3-month annualized percentage change in core CPI was back at 3% in February after briefly falling in the post-shutdown period (Chart 1). With energy prices rising sharply and tariff cost passthrough still occurring in the background, elevated inflation pressures are likely to keep the Federal Reserve cautious moving forward. As of the time of writing, financial markets have priced in a one-third chance of the Federal Reserve remaining on hold through this year.

On the tariff front, U.S. Trade Representative Greer announced several new Section 301 tariff investigations covering dozens of countries this week. Section 301 tariffs are imposed against nations engaging in unfair/anti-competitive trading practices which disadvantage U.S. commerce. The first investigation announced on Wednesday relates to “structural excess capacity and production in manufacturing” which will target 15 countries and the E.U. The targeted countries account for roughly 75% of U.S. imports, with the E.U., Mexico, and China accounting for 40-50 percentage-points of that share (Chart 2). The other Section 301 tariff investigations relate to the failure of foreign nations to effectively prohibit the importation of goods produced using forced labor and targets the 60 largest U.S. trading partners. With the global 10% Section 122 tariff imposed last month set to expire at the end of July, the administration is likely to expedite these investigations to create a new tariff regime roughly equivalent to what was in place before the IEEPA tariffs were stuck down.

Looking ahead to next week, the Federal Reserve is widely expected to hold rates steady. However, investors will be keenly watching for their views on the balance of risks amid the spike in oil prices and elevated uncertainty. The labor market has weakened in recent months, but inflation pressures appear likely to keep inflation well above 2% through the year. Chairman Powell is likely to reiterate the data dependency of the FOMC and the need for patience to monitor the sustainability of emerging trends.

The United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes on Iran over the weekend, prompting retaliatory counterattacks across other countries in the Middle East. On Monday, Iran announced that it would attack tanker ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz – a crucial choke point for 20% of global oil supply. Based on satellite imagery, shipping through the passage has effectively come to a halt. Energy prices pushed meaningfully higher this week, with WTI up roughly 33% (or $18per-barrel) and currently sits just north of $88 – its highest level since September 2023. U.S. equities were under pressure for most of the week, with February’s softer employment report adding further insult to injury on Friday. The S&P 500 looks to end the week down over 2%. Meanwhile, Treasury yields across the curve were about 20 basis points higher, as market participants pushed out the timing of expected rate cuts amid fears that higher oil prices will add further upward pressure to inflation.

Despite the sharp move in oil prices, the impact to U.S. economy (so far) remains relatively small. In large part, that’s because the U.S. is now a small net exporter of oil, so energy shocks don’t pack the same punch that they used to. Case in point: we’ve marked-to-market our oil forecast, and the upgrade (shown in Chart 1) only shaves about a tenth of a percentage point from 2026 GDP growth – barely moving the needle considering our forecast of 2.7%.

But to say that uncertainty is elevated at the moment would be an understatement. President Trump and other administration senior officials have said this week that the conflict could drag on for at least another several weeks. This suggests further upside to oil prices over the near term, particularly if oil supplies were to remain choked off indefinitely.

From the Federal Reserve’s perspective, economic theory would tell us that policymakers should “look through” the energy shock given its supply driven nature. But because the jump in oil prices is coming atop already elevated inflationary pressures, Fed officials are likely to keep a close eye on inflation expectations. So far, market-based measures have remained well anchored, but there is a risk that they could start to drift higher, particularly if the conflict were to drag on.

The further upside risk to the inflation outlook comes at a time when market participants have started to question the labor market narrative. Nonfarm employment unexpectedly declined in February (Chart 2), while the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.4%. On the surface, the employment report looked very weak, but there were a few factors including a strike and potential weather-related impacts that contributed to at least some of last month’s pullback. We feel it’s still too early to upend our prior thinking of the labor market – but it certainly underscores that current conditions are far from perfect. At the moment, the greater threat to the Fed’s dual mandate is price stability. That is reflected in market participants having pushed out the timing of next rate cut until September and are only 80% priced for a second cut.

Financial markets were largely rangebound for much of this week as investors digested the January FOMC minutes and an important run of macro data. Early market reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a large chunk of President Trump’s second term tariffs appears broadly positive, with the S&P 500 is up 0.9% from last week’s close at time of writing.

The Supreme Court ruling found that the law that underpins many of Trump’s global tariffs – the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) – “does not authorize the President to impose tariffs”. The decision did not rule on how or if tariffs that have already been paid should be refunded – a potentially messy process. We expect the U.S. administration will act quickly to recreate its tariff regime using justification from other statutes. For more on this, see our commentary here.

Prior to the tariff decision, the January FOMC minutes dominated the financial market limelight. Two key takeaways stood out from the minutes. First, the balance of risks has shifted away from labor market weakness and toward inflation staying uncomfortably high. Driving home this point was the fact that most committee members judged that “downside risks to employment had moderated, while the risk of more persistent inflation remained”. Importantly, this assessment occurred before the release of last week’s delayed payrolls report, which showed a firmer labor market than many feared. Second, most participants judged that the current policy rate is closer to neutral rather than restrictive. That assessment diminishes the urgency to resume rate cuts.

his week’s macro data broadly echoed the tone of the minutes, even as growth was weaker than expected at the end of 2025. Fourth-quarter GDP growth came in at 1.4% annualized in the first estimate, a notable slowdown from 4.4% in the third quarter (Chart 1). The disappointment was driven largely by a steep pullback in federal outlays, reflecting the 43-day government shutdown. Importantly, final sales to private domestic purchasers rose 2.4%, underscoring the resilience of underlying private sector demand despite the headline slowdown.

The December personal income and outlays report added further color to the economic backdrop at year‑end. Real consumer spending was up just 0.1% m/m in December, reflecting a pullback in goods spending. Inflation pressures, meanwhile, re‑accelerated at the margin. Core PCE inflation rose to 3.0% y/y, remaining well above target (Chart 2).

All told, even after accounting for this morning’s miss on Q4 growth, we still feel that the U.S. economy has entered 2026 with considerable momentum. That said, it appears that 2026 may start off in similar fashion to 2025 after all – with elevated tariff uncertainty. This reinforces the notion that the Fed will remain on hold for the time being, as it waits for the policy fog to clear.

Financial markets endured a rough patch this week, with a broad sell off across equities reflecting anxiety about the threat AI could pose to earnings and employment, the path of interest rates, and the durability of the ongoing expansion. That market reaction stood in contrast to the message from the January employment report. Payrolls growth came in well ahead of expectations, accompanied by a further dip in the unemployment rate. While revisions did reveal that job growth over much of 2025 was weaker than previously thought, the January rebound suggests that labor demand remains intact (Chart 1).

The rest of the data flow painted a more mixed picture of the economy. Headline CPI inflation came in softer than expected this morning, but core CPI picked up the most since August. Services inflation heated up while core goods inflation (excluding used vehicles) rose at its fastest monthly pace in nearly a year. The inflation report comes at a pivotal moment, as reports that the Trump administration may scale back its steel and aluminum tariffs suggest the administration is conscious of inflation risks.

Retail sales ended 2025 on a soft note. December sales were flat after a solid November, and downward revisions tempered the momentum implied by earlier releases. Housing data were also notably weak. Existing home sales posted their largest monthly decline in nearly four years in January, reflecting a combination of affordability constraints and bad weather (Chart 2).

Markets, meanwhile, struggled to reconcile the week’s macro data with a less accommodating policy backdrop. The equity sell off reflected concerns about growth-sensitive sectors and fear that advancements in AI may dislodge large incumbents across a wide swath of the economy, and a reassessment of the path for interest rates following a string of Fed communications. Market pricing for the Federal Reserve to reduce rates in its June meeting have fallen from 60% to around 50% over the course of this week. Speeches this week from Federal Reserve officials revealed a balance of opinion. More hawkish voices stressed that inflation remains above target and warned against premature easing, while others acknowledged that, even with a strong jobs report, there is still an argument for rate cuts later this year if disinflation continues. On balance, we read the prevailing sentiment from Fed officials as one of patience rather than urgency, but still hold on to our call for a rate cut in June. This morning’s softer CPI release may help move the Fed’s perceived balance of risks slightly towards easing, particularly if the disinflationary pressure were to persist over the coming months.

Looking ahead, our eyes will be on next week’s release of the FOMC meeting minutes, which should provide additional insight into how policymakers have been weighing inflation risks against signs of labor market stabilization. And next Friday’s PCE inflation and consumer spending data will be helpful in assessing the durability of consumer spending and the extent of momentum in recent inflation data.

The first week of February was eventful on several fronts. The partial government shutdown, which began over the weekend, ended on Tuesday as the House managed to pass the requisite spending bills. Funding for the Department of Homeland Security was provided by a 2-week continuing resolution - which expires on February 13th - as both parties continue to negotiate the details of the department’s funding. Despite the positive news, financial markets had a tough week, with the S&P 500 down 0.7% as of the time of writing, owing in part to investor concerns regarding the impact of AI on existing business models.

On the economic data front, the ISM Purchasing Manager Index (PMI) reports showed a substantial uptick in manufacturing activity in January (Chart 1). However, survey respondents noted that this was at least partly owing to post-holiday inventory replenishment and front-loading activity ahead of potential new tariffs on Europe and other nations. The services PMI also pointed to growth in activity in January, although the acceleration recorded in recent months eased. On aggregate, these reports suggest economic activity remained on a solid footing to start the new year.

Our ability to see if this translated to the labor market in January was delayed by a week owing to the shutdown, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics pushing the release of the employment report to next Wednesday (originally scheduled for February 6th). However, we did receive the Job Opening & Labor Turnover report on Thursday, which showed a sharp drop in the job opening rate in December (Chart 2), particularly among white-collar sectors. The slowdown in the labor market has been a key concern for the Federal Reserve and provided the main rationale for the three “risk management” rate cuts implemented by the FOMC last year. Next week’s employment report will be watched closely, with a healthy addition of 70k jobs currently expected by consensus forecasters.

Although the next Fed meeting is still six weeks away, the Fed officials we heard from this week - including Atlanta Fed President Bostic, Richmond Fed President Barkin, and Fed Governor Lisa Cook - were broadly consistent in their view of the balance of risks between the Fed’s dual mandate. Most believed that risks to the labor market have eased, and that the persistent deviation of inflation from the 2% target is currently the greater risk. All speakers this week stated that patience was warranted to ensure that recent disinflation progress was sustained, but Governor Cook also noted that the FOMC was cognizant of the lingering risks to the labor market and would respond accordingly to the evolving risk environment.

Core CPI inflation sat at 2.6% in December, but price growth momentum dropped materially in the aftermath of the October government shutdown disruption. Further information will be available with next week’s CPI report for January, which is expected to show a modest drop in core CPI to 2.5%.

For financial markets this week, an appropriate statement may have been “what a year this week was”. The TSX, for instance, plunged early in the week on tensions between Europe and the U.S. over Greenland. It then staged a relief rally, more-than-fully recouping those losses after President Trump eased fears of military action in the region and a renewed trade war with Europe. Canadian bond yields were also volatile, flaring higher alongside the spike in Japanese bond yields and geopolitical tensions, before pulling back a touch, as cooler heads prevailed on the Greenland issue.

These events reinforced that Canada continues to deal in an uncertain economic backdrop, and this will likely be a factor restraining economic activity in 2026. This uneasiness has certainly been weighing on consumer and business moods, and we received fresh evidence of this impact this week with the latest Bank of Canada surveys on business and consumer confidence. Although showing some improvement relative to early 2025, business sentiment continues to be “subdued” (Chart 1). The uncertainty caused by the trade war continues to weigh on investment intentions, consistent with the pullback that we are seeing in the hard data. Consumers are also concerned about trade uncertainty, though actual spending remains decent. This week’s retail spending report showed a healthy 1% monthly gain in volumes. And, although retail sales are tracking flat for Q4 overall, we see some upside risk to our fourth quarter consumption forecast, on the back of stronger services spending.

High prices were also a top concern for consumers in the Bank’s latest survey. However, there was some good news on this front this week. The Bank’s preferred core inflation metrics cooled in December (Chart 2), with the 3-month annualized percent change for the CPI-trim and CPI-median both ducking under 2%. What’s more, the share of items whose prices grew at 3% or more dropped (when measured on the same basis) - signaling a narrowing breadth of inflation across categories. However, the report wasn’t a complete slam dunk, as overall inflation increased by more than expected on the back of stronger food prices.

Tying these threads together, this week painted a picture of a soft underlying Canadian economy with moderating inflation pressures that still faces significant uncertainty. While this was enough for markets to slightly pare back their expectations of a rate hike later this year, we don’t think it was enough to meaningfully shift the policy dial. The Bank has repeatedly said that they are happy with the current policy stance, provided the economy evolves broadly in line with expectations. And, at 2.8%, core inflation landed almost bang-on the Bank’s expectation for 2025Q4. Indeed, it would take a significant undershooting of economic growth or meaningful softening in the labour market to force policymakers off the sidelines.

A full economic calendar this week built on last week’s payroll report in underscoring the economy’s resilience through a turbulent fourth quarter marked by the government shutdown. Geopolitical risks escalated amid violent protests in Iran and the prospect of U.S. involvement, sending the VIX index, gold, and oil prices higher mid-week—WTI briefly exceeded $60 per barrel—though prices retreated by week’s end as the threat of direct confrontation diminished. Surprisingly, Fed Chair Powell’s statement Sunday night where he spoke out on threats to the Fed’s ability to set interest rates free from political interference for the first time garnered little reaction from bond markets.

Resilience was evident in the retail sales report, as consumers appeared to have largely shrugged off the effects of the government shutdown. Headline sales rebounded by in November after a flat October, while sales in the control group—used in GDP calculations— were up 1% through the first two months of the quarter. This suggests Q4 2025 consumer spending growth was likely stronger than our earlier 1.1% (annualized) estimate. Next week’s personal income and spending data will provide more detail on households’ November income and spending, especially on services.

The housing market also finished last year on a firmer footing, with lower mortgage rates drawing more homebuyers off the sidelines (Chart 1). Existing home sales have now risen for four consecutive months, surging 5.1% in December to 4.35 million units—the highest since early 2023. We believe sales will continue to trend gradually higher this year; however, unless addressed, limited supply will continue to impede a stronger rebound.

Inflationary pressures remained steady in December. The headline CPI was up 2.7% year-over-year, maintaining its deceleration from the recent high of 3.0% in September. Core goods prices were stable after five consecutive monthly increases (Chart 2). Food prices were somewhat elevated, rising 0.7% month-over-month (up 3.1% year-over-year), remaining a pressure point in households’ budgets.

Although inflation steadied in December, we still expect knock-on effects from tariffs to push it higher in the coming months. FOMC member Williams (voter) expects inflation to “peak at around 2-3/4 to 3 percent during the first half of this year,” but anticipates these will be “one-off” effects. Aside from tariffs, Williams noted that underlying inflation trends have been favourable, supply chain bottlenecks are absent, and the labour market is cooling gradually.

The latest Beige Book also reported both inflation and the labour market as broadly stable, with increased economic activity  following the shutdown, and more Fed Districts seeing growth. Overall, recent data gives policymakers more reassurance that the economy stabilized at year-end while price pressures remained contained. This supports a “pause” on rate cuts for a few months, when tariff impacts are more clearly in the rear-view mirror.